<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misusability</title>
	<atom:link href="/?feed=rss2&#038;p=24" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=24</link>
	<description>Human factors, human-computer interface, GUI design, and usability engineering pondered monthly by Michael Zuschlag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:11:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donna Maurer</title>
		<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=24&#038;cpage=1#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://zuschlogin.com/?p=24#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Oh, that&#039;s not what I said. That was completly mis-quoted. I said design by testing was not the right approach. I&#039;m still a big believer of good user-centred design.

Usability testing is not user-centred design. It is testing. It should never have been as highly used as a UCD method as it currently is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that&#8217;s not what I said. That was completly mis-quoted. I said design by testing was not the right approach. I&#8217;m still a big believer of good user-centred design.</p>
<p>Usability testing is not user-centred design. It is testing. It should never have been as highly used as a UCD method as it currently is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
