<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stat 101</title>
	<atom:link href="/?feed=rss2&#038;p=78" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78</link>
	<description>Human factors, human-computer interface, GUI design, and usability engineering pondered monthly by Michael Zuschlag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:11:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Freeman</title>
		<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78&#038;cpage=1#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>I would really like to see another post discussing regression testing for significant factors.   For example, before a change to a site we had a bounce rate of X% and now after the change we have a bounce rate of Y% (actually the daily rates fluctuate with some overlap).  The goal is to see whether the change actually is having a real effect on the bounce rate or if it is just random.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like to see another post discussing regression testing for significant factors.   For example, before a change to a site we had a bounce rate of X% and now after the change we have a bounce rate of Y% (actually the daily rates fluctuate with some overlap).  The goal is to see whether the change actually is having a real effect on the bounce rate or if it is just random.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timyeo</title>
		<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78&#038;cpage=1#comment-1966</link>
		<dc:creator>timyeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78#comment-1966</guid>
		<description>I loved your opening paragraph on &quot;loving technology, hating math&quot;; it was exactly how I felt upon graduation with a Computer Science degree many years ago! 

I only use numbers in my work to substantiate the validity of my findings. What I would love is to find an easy way to use number as part of my analysis. 

You seem to have given a whole lot of thought to how numbers can not just substantiate but reveal new findings in user experience work. The problem is my mind &quot;switched off&quot; around the point you started using decimal points..(:

Do you think you could post a follow-up to this post, targeted at people like me, who would love to use numbers in their work but in a fashion that is simpler to understand and execute?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your opening paragraph on &#8220;loving technology, hating math&#8221;; it was exactly how I felt upon graduation with a Computer Science degree many years ago! </p>
<p>I only use numbers in my work to substantiate the validity of my findings. What I would love is to find an easy way to use number as part of my analysis. </p>
<p>You seem to have given a whole lot of thought to how numbers can not just substantiate but reveal new findings in user experience work. The problem is my mind &#8220;switched off&#8221; around the point you started using decimal points..(:</p>
<p>Do you think you could post a follow-up to this post, targeted at people like me, who would love to use numbers in their work but in a fashion that is simpler to understand and execute?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pete</title>
		<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78&#038;cpage=1#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Really nice review, and I love the practicality of it. People get so hung up in arguing the hard-core theoretical side that they forget the point of why we do these things. There&#039;s a balance between rigor and progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice review, and I love the practicality of it. People get so hung up in arguing the hard-core theoretical side that they forget the point of why we do these things. There&#8217;s a balance between rigor and progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olga</title>
		<link>https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78&#038;cpage=1#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://zuschlogin.com/?p=78#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have just read your post and find it very interesting and necessary. I have the same problems when I present the user tests data. Project managers don&#039;t know much about statistics, but enought to argue the validity of your findings. 
I would ask for your permission to traslate it into spanish.
Regards,
Olga</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have just read your post and find it very interesting and necessary. I have the same problems when I present the user tests data. Project managers don&#8217;t know much about statistics, but enought to argue the validity of your findings.<br />
I would ask for your permission to traslate it into spanish.<br />
Regards,<br />
Olga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
